On 28/06/2006, at 10:36 PM, Christian Schmitz wrote:
Ok, once RB optimizes my chr() calls, it will again place "ABC" in the
application, but currently it is not optimized this way.
In case anyone doesn't understand the implications of this comment,
Christian is theorising that a straight Chr(65) might be optimised
into a string constant in RB in future.
If you have an integer value calculated by something more
complicated, I'm certain it will never be optimised away in such a
revealing manner, if optimised at all.
BTW I was the person talking about a general source obfuscator a few
weeks ago but there doesn't seem to be much interest. The initial
motivation was the revealing of the fact that the RB encryption has
been trivially broken recently so offers little protection if you are
selling encrypted classes.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|