| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Microseconds rollover? |
| From: | Charles Yeomans <charles at declareSub dot com> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:30:30 -0400 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <416AE383-8C7E-4DCB-8C20-DE1CCDCFBDA4 at mobleybros dot com> <61C2F31C-C153-4998-91A8-E3F02F924EA3 at declareSub dot com> <EC8905A0-D1D5-41D5-BBEC-A9E73FFD4AEC at mobleybros dot com> |
On Aug 31, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Phil M wrote: A correction -- it isn't rollover that will happen, but you'll lose precision.On Aug 31, 2006, at 7:18 AM, Charles Yeomans wrote:The largest integer value that a double without approximation can hold is something like 10^15, so I guess you'd expect overflow every 10^9 seconds or so - about every 31 years. Probably you should test to be sure.Wow. Then I guess I don't have to worry about rollover with Microseconds. =)Thanks. Charles Yeomans _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Microseconds rollover?, Phil M |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | problems with menuitem Icon mask, José Andrés |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Microseconds rollover?, Phil M |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Microseconds rollover?, Matthias Buercher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |