| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Method vs Property |
| From: | Andy Dent <dent at oofile dot com dot au> |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Oct 2006 09:16:11 +0800 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <20060929170038 dot 743DC153AF65 at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <1108DAEC-0D85-44AB-9D29-3F123622D610 at mac dot com> <5299410F-9008-4014-AF68-2606FCDF605A at mobleybros dot com> |
On 30/09/2006, at 10:36 PM, Phil M wrote: In REALbasic 2005, a new type was added called a Computed Property. This type shows up in the Debugger just like a Regular type, has unique parts for Get and Set (read and/or write only), and has a lower overhead than general methods (much faster). So Computed Properties are, with some further naming constraints, what a C++ programmer would call a non-virtual method? This means the long-standing issue with RGBSurface's methods having become virtual could be fixed by making them Computed Properties? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Ugly iTunes scrollbars, Phil M |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ANN] Formatted Text Project alpha 8, Brendan Murphy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Method vs Property, Phil M |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Method vs Property, Phil M |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |