| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Method vs Property |
| From: | Phil M <phil at mobleybros dot com> |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:09:57 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <20060929170038 dot 743DC153AF65 at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <1108DAEC-0D85-44AB-9D29-3F123622D610 at mac dot com> <5299410F-9008-4014-AF68-2606FCDF605A at mobleybros dot com> <A5E94C7F-632E-49ED-969F-5EF4004C7502 at oofile dot com dot au> |
On Sep 30, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Andy Dent wrote: So Computed Properties are, with some further naming constraints, what a C++ programmer would call a non-virtual method? From what I understand. This means the long-standing issue with RGBSurface's methods having become virtual could be fixed by making them Computed Properties? That would be quite nice. Anything is possible, but the current compiler does not permit Computed Properties to be arrays at this point. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ANN] Formatted Text Project alpha 8, Brendan Murphy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Concatenate a right-to-left string and a left-to-right string, Christian Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Method vs Property, Andy Dent |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Method vs Property, Norman Palardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |