IMO RS should reorganize their company and start to make use of a QA
department (Quality Assurance). No product that has not been thoroughly
tested and okay'ed by QA gets released.
Of course once you're commited to a quarterly release plan like they have,
you're effectively shutting out any possibility of effective quality
control, and it should be listed relatively high on the list of "100 ways to
screw yourself and your customers".
At the time I did voice my concern, and I'd much rather sit here having been
proven wrong.
Ronald Vogelaar
http://www.rovosoft.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Stenning" <d0stenning at msn dot com>
Subject: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:-
To help those developers whose applications often break on recompilation
with a new release I have a suggestion for RS:
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|