| To: | "REALbasic NUG" <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:- |
| From: | "Ronald Vogelaar" <enter at rovosoft dot com> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:37:32 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <001d01c6fd19$dd2b9af0$6501a8c0 at lynn> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lynn Fredricks" <lfredricks at proactive-intl dot com> Unless something has dramatically changed, they have a QA team. I worked for a company that had a QA team. While formally everything was put in place for QA to work as it should, it just didn't. The team's efforts were continuously frustrated by the company's short term goals. When short term earnings become more important than any long term vision you'll find the ground under your feet eroding away faster than you can say 'Quality Assurance'. When the customers' expectations continuously fail to be met, that's writing on the wall. Ronald Vogelaar http://www.rovosoft.com A regular release schedule is reassuring in many ways - it also allows the vendor to more effectively plan upgrade campaigns. But if the schedule becomes the sole metric, then it drives you to cut outthe more intensive issues/features or let them slide from one version to thenext because the cycle is just too short.Also, my understanding is that the beta list is only accessible if you havea current license. If you are mid-project, then its very likely you do not want to upgrade your IDE - I have a project under RB 5.5.x that runs justfine (and about to be released) and one attempt at using 2006 ended up with a lost developer week. With no idea what is coming, if the bugs holding offan update to RB 200X havent been addressed, then upgrading is simply amatter of finding the current version in use (5.5.x) is totally broken. Thatisnt encouraging for sales ;-) I can live without Universal Binaries for now (Rosetta is fine for this solution) - my expectation is that Vista compatibility will be upgrade driven but I hope not - because the problems introduced under RB 2006 were just too much trouble to fix otherwise. Best regards, Lynn Fredricks President Proactive International, LLC - Because it is about who you know.(tm) http://www.proactive-intl.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> __________ NOD32 1.1845 (20061031) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | RE: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:-, Lynn Fredricks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:-, Norman Palardy |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:-, Lynn Fredricks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:-, Norman Palardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |