| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3 |
| From: | Thom McGrath <lists at thezaz dot com> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:58:22 -0400 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <D3BF77D9-2A1C-4EEF-ADB5-ED700A220FF6 at comcast dot net> |
Just curious, why is this considered a warning? Is there some kind of overhead that I missed, or is it just messy code. ....not that I frequently use it... -- Thom McGrath, <http://www.thezaz.com/> "Only those who have the patience to do simple things perfectly will acquire the skill to do difficult things easily." - Johann Freidreich Von Schiller On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Brendan Murphy wrote: > and the second is to check for misplaced > DIM statements (DIMs imbedded within blocks of code) _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Listbox: What's wrong here?, Giuseppe Farese |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Merits of nested DIM (WAS re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3), Andy Dent |
| Previous by Thread: | [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3, Brendan Murphy |
| Next by Thread: | Merits of nested DIM (WAS re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3), Andy Dent |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |