realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3
From: Thom McGrath <lists at thezaz dot com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:58:22 -0400
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <D3BF77D9-2A1C-4EEF-ADB5-ED700A220FF6 at comcast dot net>
Just curious, why is this considered a warning? Is there some kind of  
overhead that I missed, or is it just messy code.

....not that I frequently use it...

--
Thom McGrath, <http://www.thezaz.com/>
"Only those who have the patience to do simple things perfectly will  
acquire the skill to do difficult things easily." - Johann Freidreich  
Von Schiller


On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Brendan Murphy wrote:

> and the second is to check for misplaced
> DIM statements (DIMs imbedded within blocks of code)

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>