realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Merits of nested DIM (WAS re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3)

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Merits of nested DIM (WAS re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3)
From: Andy Dent <dent at oofile dot com dot au>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 10:32:43 +0800
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <D3BF77D9-2A1C-4EEF-ADB5-ED700A220FF6 at comcast dot net> <D17A7C2B-C610-473D-90D0-25DDAFED701E at thezaz dot com>
Quoting Thom McGrath <lists at thezaz dot com>:

> Just curious, why is this considered a warning? Is there some kind of
> overhead that I missed, or is it just messy code.

> On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Brendan Murphy wrote:
>
>> and the second is to check for misplaced
>> DIM statements (DIMs imbedded within blocks of code)

Now that it is available (I moved up from 5.5 a few months ago), I  
quite frequently use it to guarantee scope of variables.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>