| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Merits of nested DIM (WAS re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3) |
| From: | Andy Dent <dent at oofile dot com dot au> |
| Date: | Tue, 01 May 2007 10:32:43 +0800 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <D3BF77D9-2A1C-4EEF-ADB5-ED700A220FF6 at comcast dot net> <D17A7C2B-C610-473D-90D0-25DDAFED701E at thezaz dot com> |
Quoting Thom McGrath <lists at thezaz dot com>: > Just curious, why is this considered a warning? Is there some kind of > overhead that I missed, or is it just messy code. > On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Brendan Murphy wrote: > >> and the second is to check for misplaced >> DIM statements (DIMs imbedded within blocks of code) Now that it is available (I moved up from 5.5 a few months ago), I quite frequently use it to guarantee scope of variables. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3, Thom McGrath |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Merits of nested DIM (WAS re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3), Tim Hare |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3, Thom McGrath |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Merits of nested DIM (WAS re: [ANN] RB Code Reports version 1.3), Tim Hare |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |