realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha
From: Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:14:20 -0600
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <fed2e2560705301533t6d8f66cdw86e8a3125dcf4128 at mail dot gmail dot com> <15F7B30A-E60E-4AA0-AF1E-F48054C42201 at great-white-software dot com> <5d7ca37e0705301827k7040dabvb66af85f6972cd70 at mail dot gmail dot com> <fed2e2560705310906i5b2ca1f1h2d02bc2603d5a75d at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 31-May-07, at 10:06 AM, Dennis Birch wrote:

> On 5/30/07, Mathieu Langlois <realsoftlists at gmail dot com> wrote:
>> Sounds to me like an architectural difference between the 2 cpus.   
>> I doubt
>> RS can do much about it.
>
> Perhaps that is so. In that case, I hope my bringing this up on the
> list is helpful to others.
>
> But it appears to me that it's a case of RB number constants being
> handled differently, which may be within the engineers' control.

Since constants don't let us specify their exact type it could be  
simply how promoting a the single to a double behaves

They derive their type from the contents and so you can't say this  
const is a double, this one a single, this one a Uint64


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>