| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha |
| From: | Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 May 2007 10:14:20 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <fed2e2560705301533t6d8f66cdw86e8a3125dcf4128 at mail dot gmail dot com> <15F7B30A-E60E-4AA0-AF1E-F48054C42201 at great-white-software dot com> <5d7ca37e0705301827k7040dabvb66af85f6972cd70 at mail dot gmail dot com> <fed2e2560705310906i5b2ca1f1h2d02bc2603d5a75d at mail dot gmail dot com> |
On 31-May-07, at 10:06 AM, Dennis Birch wrote: > On 5/30/07, Mathieu Langlois <realsoftlists at gmail dot com> wrote: >> Sounds to me like an architectural difference between the 2 cpus. >> I doubt >> RS can do much about it. > > Perhaps that is so. In that case, I hope my bringing this up on the > list is helpful to others. > > But it appears to me that it's a case of RB number constants being > handled differently, which may be within the engineers' control. Since constants don't let us specify their exact type it could be simply how promoting a the single to a double behaves They derive their type from the contents and so you can't say this const is a double, this one a single, this one a Uint64 _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha, Dennis Birch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha, Dennis Birch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha, Dennis Birch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha, Dennis Birch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |