Silly question...(do I ask any other? :-)
What exactly makes a database "multiuser", according to the license?
RB Standard has a single-user license.
If you make an application that lets two or three people use a client
program that connects over a socket to a server application, like an RB
web server made by the standard version and stores wiki-like entries in
the database...is it single user because it's only one database being
used by one application, the server? Or is it multiuser because
multiple people are using (non-database equipped) clients to communicate
with the server application that does use the database?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
From Fri 7 Sep 2007 15:25:46 -0600
Return-Path: <realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
X-Original-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Received: by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix, from userid 1037)
id BAA854129AB8; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on
www.realsoftware.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=ham version=3.1.1
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (m.realsoftware.com [66.116.103.65])
by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28274129AA4;
Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from real-software-mini.local (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CED562DB6F;
Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:25:37 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Received: from mail.verex.com (mail.verex.com [66.116.103.197])
by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA3E62DB54
for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:25:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [66.116.103.197] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.verex.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E6747BB3A7
for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:25:46 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:25:46 -0600
Subject: Re: Boolean ops now also do bitwise, discuss changes please
From: joe at strout dot net
To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
In-Reply-To: <1FE657A5-27A8-44AC-934B-1C424F8087E6 at declareSub dot com>
X-Mailer: VerEx Email Gateway
Message-Id: <20070907212546 dot 7E6747BB3A7 at mail dot verex dot com>
X-BeenThere: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Errors-To: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
On Sep 07, 2007, at 20:55 UTC, Charles Yeomans wrote:
> I have to say that I'm not too bothered by this, not least because
> this gotcha predates overloading of And, Or, etc. Try, for instance,
> code like
>
> if not foo isA Window then
>
> This will not compile.
Not compiling is good. Compiling, but sometimes failing to do what you
expect at runtime, is bad. That's why I don't like this change; it
causes the latter, at least in some cases.
Best,
- Joe
--
Joe Strout -- joe at strout dot net
Strout Custom Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|