Re: Why does QUESA have to be dynamically linked in Windows/Linux?

[Tim Jones <tjmac at tolisgroup dot com>]

Norman Palardy wrote:
> On 14-Sep-07, at 2:24 PM, Tim Jones wrote:
>
>   
>> I may be missing something, but if the Quesa libs are built in, why
>> would you need declares?
>>     
>
> To get at the functions that are not exposed by the plugin
>   

Then why not just ignore the plugin and provide the dynamic library 
based on the code available at Sourceforge?  This would allow you to do 
everything by declare and make sure that you always had the latest 
version for functions.  Or, convert the current library code to a plugin.

I guess I'm just not getting this since it doesn't affect me directly.  
I am curious however as there are other functions that appear to be 
suffering from similar changes in implementation.

Tim

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>