on 9/19/07 8:13 PM, Brad Rhine at support at bradrhine dot com wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2007, at 7:13 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
>
>>> I tend to agree. I think they've moved their communication to the
>>> forums, which would be fine if forums didn't suck so much. :)
>>> Except
>>> for William, who (to be fair) did post his thoughts about Rb3D here.
>>
>> Actually I'm not sure this is "official" communication but AAron did
>> mention that binding are deprecated.
>>
>> I can't find any such mention in the release notes though
>
> Actually, Mars later clarified that bindings are *scheduled* to be
> deprecated in R5. Here's his post from the forum:
>
> ====
> I'm sorry about all this confusion. We had planned to drop the
> bindings feature in 2007r5, since it has been stagnant and basically
> unsupported for years. The binding bug came up late in the 2007r4
> development process and we decided that it did not make sense to
> invest a lot of dev time updating a feature we were about to remove.
>
> We've fixed the delete bug for 2007r5, so you will at least be able
> to remove old bindings.
>
> We have made some internal changes to the way we handle the
> deprecation process and I expect to do a better job communicating
> about these changes in the future.
> ====
It sure seems like there is a lot of chaos inside of RS at this point. All
of the engineers are communicating as individuals instead of a cohesive
team. Not a good sign for future work quality.
Chris
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|