| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators) |
| From: | Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:36:22 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <BAY107-DAV8132ACB18FF1E0678E2E693B20 at phx dot gbl> <981FFB08-71D3-487B-8A80-4352EE252BB4 at chaoticbox dot com> <2E23AD6D-B086-4475-8213-4C68AB804CFC at great-white-software dot com> <8458FDB7-710C-4350-8FF2-435B36560A6B at declareSub dot com> |
On 29-Sep-07, at 11:02 AM, Charles Yeomans wrote: > I tried this (actually i\2). It saved a few ms, but that's it. Wonder if getting rid of the various p.single(0) p.integer(0) accesses would not alter that Seems that there are a fair number of accessor methods called _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 3D Mach-O, Norman Palardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators), Marco Bambini |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators), Charles Yeomans |
| Next by Thread: | Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators), Charles Yeomans |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |