realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators)

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators)
From: Charles Yeomans <charles at declareSub dot com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:48:56 -0400
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <BAY107-DAV8132ACB18FF1E0678E2E693B20 at phx dot gbl> <981FFB08-71D3-487B-8A80-4352EE252BB4 at chaoticbox dot com> <2E23AD6D-B086-4475-8213-4C68AB804CFC at great-white-software dot com> <8458FDB7-710C-4350-8FF2-435B36560A6B at declareSub dot com> <79B74153-6AE8-4863-8CD1-1CDC7DA24DEF at great-white-software dot com>
On Sep 29, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:

>
> On 29-Sep-07, at 11:02 AM, Charles Yeomans wrote:
>
>> I tried this (actually i\2).  It saved a few ms, but that's it.
>
> Wonder if getting rid of the various p.single(0) p.integer(0)
> accesses would not alter that
> Seems that there are a fair number of accessor methods called
>

I'm not sure.  As I recall, these are not method calls.

Charles Yeomans
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>