| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Logic used in ordering of dropped folderitems? |
| From: | Tim Jones <tjmac at tolisgroup dot com> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:32:36 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <mailman dot 3032 dot 1193790173 dot 262 dot realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <225778B8-36E2-49AC-A67F-A766EEA6B596 at mindspring dot com> <1D7B2876-C16B-46A2-B5EB-77A85E3C0E49 at inspiringapps dot com> <E53C550D-F332-45CE-8AD4-487B6602BF62 at shaw dot ca> <A24921C6-9FBB-416D-BDD7-0769C80438C6 at declareSub dot com> <CC3A82A8-BFB4-4D81-9DB8-16926B4A96FA at shaw dot ca> <20071031163219 dot AA45D76D06 at isis dot visi dot com> |
On Oct 31, 2007, at 9:32 AM, Craig A. Finseth wrote: > So, the order is random, sort of. But you only notice this if you are > working at the program level. As a user, you ar pretty much unaware > of the underlying order. I've just done some tests and there also appears to be an "order in which you selected" nature when dropping form the desktop. However, I've just accepted the apparent fact that I can't "expect" a certain order in the list of objects dropped and sort them myself as I need when they're dropped. Tim _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Timer Questions, Keith DeLong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Timer Questions, Charles Yeomans |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Logic used in ordering of dropped folderitems?, Terry Ford |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Logic used in ordering of dropped folderitems?, Charles Yeomans |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |