realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: HTMLViewer Options

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: HTMLViewer Options
From: Joe Strout <joe at inspiringapps dot com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:28:06 -0700
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <D098D299-8957-4EFF-905C-F28956F628AC at thezaz dot com>
On Nov 30, 2007, at 8:00 AM, Thom McGrath wrote:

> I'm getting very frustrated, personally. I find that I can never
> complete a project due to some dumb bug, or incomplete feature. Even
> something this simple, looks like I may not be able to achieve in
> REALbasic, forcing me to learn a new tool and language. This is why I
> haven't renewed in a while...

To be fair, if you were using some other tool or language, it  
probably wouldn't have an HTML control at all.  You'd be forced to  
either write your own or hook into something provided by the OS via  
declares or ActiveX -- and you can do either of those in RB, too.

What's frustrating here is that RB gives you the *appearance* of  
being able to do a project simply, and it appears to work in simple  
tests, so you go ahead and commit to a project -- and then discover  
that it can't be done simply at all.  I got bit by this myself (also  
by the HTMLViewer control), and have a dissatisfied client as a  
result.  I would have been better off if the HTMLViewer were not part  
of the feature list, so I wouldn't have been suckered into thinking  
that I could use it.

Best,
- Joe

--
Joe Strout
Inspiring Applications, Inc.
http://www.InspiringApps.com



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>