| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FR: Weak Delegates (was Re: Some questions about delegates) |
| From: | Andy Dent <dent at oofile dot com dot au> |
| Date: | Sat, 1 Dec 2007 11:16:17 +0900 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <BAY107-DAV4A856F93620F2D65BA3C693710 at phx dot gbl> <8162A20A-AA06-46C4-8293-78D1BE7AE094 at chaoticbox dot com> <653CDEAD-238A-41A5-B733-0F7D18A3742C at mac dot com> <16692A87-04A2-4423-BE7A-8054FED03C9F at declareSub dot com> |
On 01/12/2007, at 10:38 AM, Charles Yeomans wrote: > > I note, though, that delegates can be stored in WeakRef objects. So > I'm not sure that such a feature request is crucial. Double dispatching overhead removed? Saves time on the checking if the WeakRef is nil (good example of exception throwing vs checking error codes). Nicely packaged in a single entity you can put in an array. Seems reasonable to me as an addition which just nicely combines two existing concepts. Andy Dent BSc MACS http://www.oofile.com.au/ OOFILE - Database, Reports, Graphs, GUI for c++ on multiple platforms REALbasic, C++, Python, Mac and Windows development and porting _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Memory leak or Absorption, Terry Ford |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Memory leak or Absorption, Dave Wooldridge |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FR: Weak Delegates (was Re: Some questions about delegates), Charles Yeomans |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FR: Weak Delegates (was Re: Some questions about delegates), Guyren Howe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |