realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding

To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Subject: Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding
From: "Theodore H. Smith" <delete at elfdata dot com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:36:38 +0000
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <mailman dot 10314 dot 1204264539 dot 9216 dot realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
> Oh horsefeathers.  Until you publish something for peer review --
> though finding some for you might be difficult -- you're just
> wanking.  You said it yourself -- your work should speak for itself.


Well that's just retarded.

My work did speak for itself. It spoke to me :) Just because I'm the  
one who made it, I'm not allowed to talk about how good it, despite  
that a different user would?

I have two roles to play, the creator AND the user of my own work.  
It's the user side of me that says how good my work is.

Sad you can't see that simple logic.

--
http://elfdata.com/plugin/
"String processing, done right"


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>