realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding
From: Charles Yeomans <charles at declareSub dot com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:15:57 -0500
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <mailman dot 10314 dot 1204264539 dot 9216 dot realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <6999915C-A9A9-4073-B530-9FC2AC655C24 at elfdata dot com> <6D9E0AB3-9B76-4381-8624-4279966B300D at great-white-software dot com>
On Feb 29, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Norman Palardy wrote:

>
> On 29-Feb-08, at 3:45 AM, Theodore H. Smith wrote:
>
>>>>> It also demonstrates that your at least persistent enough to
>>>>> accomplish and acquire one instead of just waving your hands and
>>>>> shouting "bullshit" at it.
>>>>
>>>> But not smart enough to realise that you can acheive more outside  
>>>> of
>>>> the academia? Must be a very useful kind of intelligence, smart
>>>> enough
>>>> to be persistant at what others tell you is a good thing, but not
>>>> smart enough to question if it is REALLY a good thing.
>>>
>>> Ah right you have to have NOT had a degree to realize that.
>>
>> Nope. Honestly the main thing University seems to teach is arrogance.
>
> Apparently you didnt have to go to school to get that part
>
> Rule # 59 goes back in to effect

It's great to have the old Theo back.

Charles Yeomans

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>