| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding |
| From: | Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:33:57 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <mailman dot 10314 dot 1204264539 dot 9216 dot realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <6999915C-A9A9-4073-B530-9FC2AC655C24 at elfdata dot com> <6D9E0AB3-9B76-4381-8624-4279966B300D at great-white-software dot com> <24C75F8D-6ADA-4B0D-B4DF-31F547B352F7 at declareSub dot com> |
On 29-Feb-08, at 8:15 AM, Charles Yeomans wrote: >> Apparently you didnt have to go to school to get that part >> >> Rule # 59 goes back in to effect > > It's great to have the old Theo back. And mail rules that let you do what you want :P _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding, Charles Yeomans |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OT] Responding to Theo - was...who cares..., Brendan Murphy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding, Charles Yeomans |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding, Theodore H. Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |