| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding |
| From: | Harrie Westphal <harriew at frontiernet dot net> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:33:48 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <mailman dot 10314 dot 1204264539 dot 9216 dot realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <67C8B2A2-03EC-4EE5-A906-B209ABB1D83A at elfdata dot com> |
On Feb 29, 2008, at 4:36 AM, Theodore H. Smith wrote: > My work did speak for itself. It spoke to me :) Just because I'm the > one who made it, I'm not allowed to talk about how good it, despite > that a different user would? Theo, After all this time I am still trying to figure out what it is that you want... a medal or a chest to pin it on. They didn't teach me how to figure that one out when studying for my Electrical Engineering degree. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OT] Responding to Theo - was...who cares..., Brendan Murphy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding, Theodore H. Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding, Theodore H. Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding, Theodore H. Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |