realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Dealing with multi-processor or multi-core

To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Subject: Dealing with multi-processor or multi-core
From: Jean-Luc Arnaud <jean-luc at cdmultimedia dot fr>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:40:13 +0200
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com designates 66.116.103.65 as permitted sender) smtp dot mail=realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Hi,

My upgrade plan finishes soon and before paying for a new plan, I 
would like to get information about RB and multi-processor management.

A lot of messages on this list claimed about the fact that RB does 
not use more than one processor (or one core) at a time. it is 
incredible and unacceptable !! What is RS waiting for, to develop 
these functions?
Would I be obliged to switch to C++ or other, in order to get high 
performances ?
I hope no, because I like RB and its object-oriented language, its 
graphic interface, the ability to call dll or libraries, to compile 
for Mac, Windows and Linux (and a lot of amazing other features). But 
if RS does not plan to deal with multiproc/multicore, I will have to.

Do you have any information about that ?

TIA

Jean-Luc
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>