realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Dealing with multi-processor or multi-core

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with multi-processor or multi-core
From: Daniel Stenning <d0stenning at msn dot com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 13:37:44 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com designates 66.116.103.65 as permitted sender) smtp dot mail=realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Thread-index: AcjCUfUVM6AfLi5FEd2PAgAbY5KfzA==
Thread-topic: Dealing with multi-processor or multi-core
And its doubtful if there would be anything language or class/datatype wise
that would make the job of coding for multiple processors any simpler than
what Christian has done with his class already.  If RS reworked their
framework to be more pre-emptive-thread safe that might help I suppose


On 30/5/08 13:00, "Christian Schmitz"
<realbasiclists at monkeybreadsoftware dot de> wrote:

> Jean-Luc Arnaud <jean-luc at cdmultimedia dot fr> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> My upgrade plan finishes soon and before paying for a new plan, I
>> would like to get information about RB and multi-processor management.
> 
> Well, the ThreadMBS class does support multi cores, but it is more
> difficult to develop with it correctly.
> 
> Gruß
> Christian

Cheers,
Dan




_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>