| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation |
| From: | Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 May 2008 22:16:45 -0600 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com designates 66.116.103.65 as permitted sender) smtp dot mail=realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <1F5D7379-4B88-4ABE-81F8-064A4F575B16 at verizon dot net> |
On 30-May-08, at 7:50 PM, Karen wrote: > But these days variants can store arrays so I thought why not store a > two element variant array in the CellTag for column 0 instead of > using a dictionary or an object. That MIGHT both be faster and more > memory efficient that either of the above solutions... What do you > think? What type of situation would this be better or worst for? > if you always make a 2 member array you always allocate room for a rowtag whether you need it or not the dictionary didn't _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dealing with multi-processor or multi-core, Glenn L. Austin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EndOfLine Windows v. OS X, David Glass |
| Previous by Thread: | Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation, Karen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation, Karen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |