realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation
From: Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:16:45 -0600
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com designates 66.116.103.65 as permitted sender) smtp dot mail=realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <1F5D7379-4B88-4ABE-81F8-064A4F575B16 at verizon dot net>
On 30-May-08, at 7:50 PM, Karen wrote:

> But these days variants can store arrays so I thought why not store a
> two element variant array in the CellTag for column 0 instead of
> using a dictionary or an object. That MIGHT both be faster and more
> memory efficient that either of the above solutions... What do you
> think? What type of situation would this be better or worst for?
>
if you always make a 2 member array you always allocate room for a  
rowtag whether you need it or not
the dictionary didn't
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>