| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation |
| From: | Karen <keatk at verizon dot net> |
| Date: | Sat, 31 May 2008 11:07:41 -0400 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com designates 66.116.103.65 as permitted sender) smtp dot mail=realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <1F5D7379-4B88-4ABE-81F8-064A4F575B16 at verizon dot net> <8A496A12-32A3-4ED2-A2F1-3935F458F075 at declareSub dot com> |
On May 31, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Charles Yeomans wrote: > > This would be a good place to use Pair objects. > > How would that be any different from my original solution of creating a class with only two variant properties? Objects of any sort ( instances of framework or our own classes) have more memory overhead than arrays, no? - Karen _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation, Charles Yeomans |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation, Karen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation, Charles Yeomans |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Efficient Lisbox RowTag Implementation, Charles Yeomans |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |