realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: does thread.kill not kill?

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: does thread.kill not kill?
From: Thomas Tempelmann <tempelmann@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:05:59 +0200
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KeGAQLNGLU6ePzB80TIKvu8Amnl1d8XuLcsLMhFgnSU=; b=qj9csYlMc/yeFtwO07rbFm3tuS1JO/1BWLB2LqdvlvGQLWalj7iskIyBrAJa1S7W+T h4S3SSeu6ZUFTzfXE8OVi+xx435WpeyC/XW7M8R98xEFlhu31ja0JZgRN5qwfIW8uB31 8TrE9wCOrH078YyRWFvz7egYymgRjrMzk+iHM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RHpoHDN04D4IBHpXqgcucVLCB5ttyFGcbYvgRpxTfS+MJTDFtpn/qMDU/GyC55fcIu fovcqo2bLcmh1N4eQp1la/XZWrZSpERUnQbz8V5zS5lPm0VK6NRWUFu6y/bNstxjF0Og Lq6RlxMKzXoxF3/CVnbiCITo/8BRZXKC6bd2Q=
In-reply-to: <77124270904221447u124cb92bv3da7e5fb04bba5a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <77124270904221229i6e092762r14a2e7547223d5fd@mail.gmail.com> <20090422194839.9EB4276D16@isis.visi.com> <77124270904221447u124cb92bv3da7e5fb04bba5a@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 23:47, Peter K. Stys <pkstys@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>        if self.RBthread_autosat.State = thread.Running then
>          self.RBthread_autosat.kill   ' then kill it
>          while self.RBthread_autosat.State = thread.Running
>            app.YieldToNextThread
>          wend
>        end if

your while loop does wait for the thread not being "running", but
there may be other states before it's ready to run anew again. so, you
may want to wait for that state.

-- 
Thomas Tempelmann, http://www.tempel.org/

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>