Hmm, while nothing can be said against having it as a setter/getter
pair,
it does not make possible inspection of the "property" "Secure" in the
current RB-debugger, if you know what I mean.
Correct.
I'd prefer to use the REALproperty list for declarations if there is a
choice between REALMethodDefinition and REALproperty, because of
debugger
considerations.
There are valid reasons for our choice of method pairs instead of
properties. When possible, we try to use properties, but there are
just going to be times when that's not possible (for example, if the
property causes side effects).
~Aaron
--
REAL World 2005 - The REALbasic User Conference
March 23-25, 2005, Austin, Texas
<http://www.realsoftware.com/realworld>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|