On Apr 18, 2005, at 10:49 AM, Björn Eiríksson wrote:
On 18.4.2005, at 16:41, Norman Palardy wrote:
On Apr 18, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Joseph J. Strout wrote:
At 4:12 PM +0000 4/18/05, Björn Eiríksson wrote:
I take it that this basically means that the icon cannot look good
in Mac style non .rbx plugin ?
It means it can't have an 8-bit mask, correct. It also can't support
the larger icon we may use at some point in the future. Please move
to the new RBX format.
If you still want the plugin to be useful by older RB versions then
you cant use the RBX format for those old versions.
I think that's the gist of the question.
No RBX has been around for quite a while, I don't think we support in
new plugins any REALbasic version that does not support RBX.
Quite possible. iut has been around for a long while and the ONLY
reason I could suppose that anyone would not want to support it is
because of very old RB versions.
So there is no good reason for me not to use RBX also for the Mac
except few reasons like: 1) Users hate the RBX because there is no
obvious version info in it.
I hate that as well
2) I dislike the concept of rbx because they are very slow.
Using you plugins in a fairly large project I'm working on for a client
I dont seem to see any slowness.
Where might a developer notice this ?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|