on 5/24/05 12:50 AM, Brendan Murphy at bmurf at comcast dot net wrote:
> This discussion is not about the RBX virtual volume format itself,
> it is about standardizing the version information so end users can
> manage their plugins.
Yes, I did understand it was about the version info. But you were
complaining about open sourcing of certain tool(s). It then became unclear.
I also believe the discussion is kind of moot, since William suggested to
version the plugin name inside the vv.
Alfred
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|