Re: Operator_Convert

[Mars Saxman <mars at realsoftware dot com>]

On Jun 28, 2005, at 7:30 PM, Alfred Van Hoek wrote:

> Consider the following situation:
>
> Class myClass:    Operator_Convert(control as myControl)
> Control myControl:    Operator_Convert() as myClass
>
> dim a as myClass
> dim b as myControl
>
> a = b
>
> will not call the initializer of myClass, unless Operator_Convert()  
> as myClass is removed. This is intended behavior?
Yes. If both conversions exist, the "convert to" operator always  
takes precedence over the "convert from" operator.
Mars Saxman
REAL Software
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>