A Rule of thumb, if you need it then others need it, so if RS needs
internal classes, then there are bound to be cases where Plugin
authors need internal classes too. (Something to think about when
designing a SDK)
(Not that I have ever used them my self)
Björn
On 29.6.2005, at 21:18, Joseph J. Strout wrote:
At 11:03 PM +0200 6/29/05, Christian Schmitz wrote:
> Put a _ in front of the class name.
Cool. Thank you. I'll use that.
(it should be documented)
No, it should NOT. This is not a feature we want our plugin
authors to use. All identifier names starting with an underscore
are reserved for use by us, for several reasons. If we wanted you
using it, we'd have documented it -- and just because somebody has
discovered it, is not a good reason to use it. Future versions of
REALbasic may well make identifiers starting with an underscore a
syntax error, which would cause plugins using it to break.
Thanks,
- Joe
--
Joe Strout REAL Software, Inc.
Vote for REALbasic (twice!) in the LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Awards:
http://linux.sys-con.com/general/readerschoice.htm
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|