On Jul 10, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Thomas Tempelmann wrote:
Jonathan Johnson wrote:
We will not attempt to "fix" it when we break it.
Waaahhh! You are sooooo mean!
;)
But seriously, why not make this hack an official solution?
Because we aren't ready to make a decision about what the sanctioned
path will be. When we do, that feedback report will be closed and
marked as Implemented in (Insert some version). ;)
Seriously though, it's simply because we can foresee some things
changing in the coming years that will break this hack, at least in
some form or another. The support costs for fixing it could be much
larger than if we were to expose the functionality in the SDK through
some other mechanism. I'm being intentionally vague, so you'll just
have to trust us on our analysis :)
However, we haven't made any decisions about the way to expose the
functionality, nor when to do it, so if you're interested in it,
please do sign onto the report that Thomas pointed out earlier. Also,
it would be helpful for you to note what specific features from the
SDK you are looking for, so that we can better understand what is
desired.
What speaks
against it as long as you agree that there should be SOME way to
use the
Plugin API functions thru Declares?
I didn't agree to that. I agreed that there's functionality that
should be exposed. :)
-Jon
--
Jonathan Johnson
REAL Software, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|