| To: | REALbasic Plugins <realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: REALLoadObjectMethod leaking memory? |
| From: | Alexander Traud <alexander dot traud at macnews dot de> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:11:21 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
> happy that these function pointers are not destroyed magically. Yes, but several strings on the heap are something else than a function pointer. Yes, a REALbasic function pointer could move but we have concepts like handles or similar for something like that. I see no reason why the *NAME of a parameter* is hold on the heap. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: REALLoadObjectMethod leaking memory?, Alfred Van Hoek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: REALLoadObjectMethod leaking memory?, Alfred Van Hoek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: REALLoadObjectMethod leaking memory?, Alfred Van Hoek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: REALLoadObjectMethod leaking memory?, Alfred Van Hoek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |