On 2/5/06 7:28 PM, "Jonathan Johnson" <jonj at realsoftware dot com> wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
>>> * As far as I see, REALBasic always choose PEF-Carbon plugin for this.
>>>
>>> * If I build .rbx with MACHO and Windows plugins only then REALbasic
>>> do not
>>> see plugin at all.
>>>
>>
>> It has been said several times, that the workaround would be to not
>> encapsulate the dylib into a virtual .rbx volume. Then RB will use the
>> dylib to load the plugin in the IDE. THe other workaround is to add a
>> dummy pef target in the rbx, and you will be fine
>
> I don't believe this is a problem in 2005/6 anymore. Or rather, I
> haven't experienced the problem myself with some of our plugins that
> only have Mach-O, Windows, and Linux targets.
Jonathan,
So If I build plugin.rbx that contains only mach + win
It still should work with RB2005 ?
Good to know.
Another question to REAL team.
is REALbasic 2005/6 Is true MACHO compiled application?
----------------------------
P.S. Then problem comes probably that our macho plugin depends on additional
dlls that have "@executable_path/../VComponents/
Alfred says that even dylib itself without rbx should work.
Hmm this is IDEAL variant for us. I will try make it working.
Thank you guys!
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|