On 2/5/06, Ruslan Zasukhin <sunshine at public dot kherson dot ua> wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> So If I build plugin.rbx that contains only mach + win
> It still should work with RB2005 ?
Yes
>
> Good to know.
>
>
> Another question to REAL team.
> is REALbasic 2005/6 Is true MACHO compiled application?
No, it's a PEF application currently.
> P.S. Then problem comes probably that our macho plugin depends on additional
> dlls that have "@executable_path/../VComponents/
That would be a problem, most likely. To work in the PEF IDE, we
create a dummy bundle structure in the /tmp directory. We then use
CFBundleCreate to load it up, and find the main entrypoint.
> Alfred says that even dylib itself without rbx should work.
> Hmm this is IDEAL variant for us. I will try make it working.
It won't in 2006r1 due to a bug. You should always distribute plugins
in RBX format for your users, and only debug with plain dylibs.
HTH,
Jon
--
Jonathan Johnson
REAL Software, Inc.
REAL World 2006, The REALbasic User's Conference
<http://www.realsoftware.com/realworld>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|