realbasic-plugins
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Double-buffering read/write to files

To: REALbasic Plugins <realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Double-buffering read/write to files
From: Menneteau <fmteau at Club-Internet dot fr>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:12:48 +0100
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <557C772B-523C-457F-9A99-D5E7A0628387 at elfdata dot com> <60300C4A-3D6E-489F-8BAB-AC98685A9DBE at elfdata dot com> <457DBEFE dot 7060808 at Club-Internet dot fr> <E2F791C5-95CD-4FC7-8C40-4AFC38C212C0 at elfdata dot com>
Theodore H. Smith wrote:

On 11 Dec 2006, at 20:26, Menneteau wrote:

Thanks Mennetau, nice answer.

One more though. What is the difference between fopen and open?

Why is there an fopen call when open seems to do it all, and even better? Is fopen better buffered, or what?

fopen is a higher level call that gives you access to higher level calls
such as fgets/fgetws (get string/wstrinf from afile) that you don"t get with read.

Anyhow, for my case, I don't want any buffering.

Do you have any idea how I can ask the OS what is it's preferred file I/O read/write size?


perhaps with sysctl. For example, you can get the software page size and any I/O operation is a multiple of that value


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>