| To: | REALbasic Plugins <realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Double-buffering read/write to files |
| From: | Charles Yeomans <yeomans at desuetude dot com> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:41:37 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <557C772B-523C-457F-9A99-D5E7A0628387 at elfdata dot com> <60300C4A-3D6E-489F-8BAB-AC98685A9DBE at elfdata dot com> <457DBEFE dot 7060808 at Club-Internet dot fr> <E2F791C5-95CD-4FC7-8C40-4AFC38C212C0 at elfdata dot com> |
On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Theodore H. Smith wrote: On 11 Dec 2006, at 20:26, Menneteau wrote: Thanks Mennetau, nice answer. One more though. What is the difference between fopen and open?Why is there an fopen call when open seems to do it all, and even better? Is fopen better buffered, or what?Anyhow, for my case, I don't want any buffering.Do you have any idea how I can ask the OS what is it's preferred file I/O read/write size? I think stat is the function you want for this. Charles Yeomans _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Was Plugin slowdown on intel?, Fredrik Wahlgren |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | plugins using Frameworks, Alexander Cohen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Double-buffering read/write to files, Norman Palardy |
| Next by Thread: | Create Variant of type "date", Kirill Pekarov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |