On Dec 24, 2006, at 12:16 AM, Christian Schmitz wrote:
No. You should not assume that RB stored the data from a before or
behind the b data.
So you go the way Alfred showed. With different structs for each
class.
This is not correct and I dont think it was what Alfred was actually
saying to him at all.
When you inherit then you get all the structs from the child classes
also
So if class a has struct a:
struct a
{
int a;
int b;
}
Then if you want a subclass with one additiona filed then you dont
need to do
struct b
{
int ab;
int b;
int c;
}
But instead you just do:
struct b
{
int c;
}
But you can still access the int a and int b, the way Alfred just said.
If you are doing it any other way, having all the fields in a base
class or defining the data over and over again then you are just
simply wasting memory for nothing.
--
______________________________________________________________________
Björn Eiríksson bjorn at einhugur dot com
Einhugur Software
http://www.einhugur.com/
______________________________________________________________________
Einhugur Software has sold its products in 55 countries world wide.
______________________________________________________________________
For support: support at einhugur dot com
To post on the maillist: plugins at einhugur dot com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|