On 24 Dec 2006, at 00:16, Christian Schmitz wrote:
Theodore H. Smith <delete at elfdata dot com> wrote:
I've started making my first plugin class which is a subclass of
another class.
Ok.
Now, I have a question. Are there any known issues with this?
No.
Basically, I'm assuming that subclassing in RB works like it's
supposed to.
Yes. But if you subclass RB and C++ you have two sub classes which do
not work together directly.
Do you know they don't work properly, though? Tested it?
I do normally declare a struct with all the fields ever used in the
subclasses and than only use that one struct for all.
That's a real waste :(
Why do you do this? Because you don't trust RB to work properly? Or why?
I don't like the idea of wasting a single byte. It all adds up you
see. Sometimes I may waste a byte or two though ;) but only when it
adds up to a better practice in other areas of the app or my
development process.
If it's unneccessary, I'd rather avoid that waste!
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|