| To: | REALbasic Plugins <realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Change of Suggested Mach-O Plugin Format |
| From: | Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> |
| Date: | Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:28:10 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <1hrfxx3 dot 9cvwtl15sluxmM%support at monkeybreadsoftware dot de> <D7D6D53A-9A6C-42CA-89F8-8849AF9788A9 at chaoticbox dot com> <7E86D7F2-5614-4E47-9475-3FAB38ACED3E at realsoftware dot com> |
On Jan 06, 2007, at 11:18 AM, Jonathan Johnson wrote: We haven't had very many users affected by this yet, and the function we're relying on is 10.3 and higher. We've been looking into other ways to solve it, but don't have any immediate fixes in mind.Personally, I hope to find a solution for it in r2, but no promises.As to your question, the MH_BUNDLE format from all I can tell has been there since NeXT days, and should work back as far as RB goes. If a developer does not do this they suffer longer load times but can still work on OS X versions < 10.3 (all 10.1 and 10.2) ? Just trying to understand the pros / cons of this and the implications _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Change of Suggested Mach-O Plugin Format, Jonathan Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Change of Suggested Mach-O Plugin Format, Jonathan Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Change of Suggested Mach-O Plugin Format, Jonathan Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Change of Suggested Mach-O Plugin Format, Jonathan Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |