realbasic-plugins
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OT: Framework vs. dylib (Was: Incorporating existing C/C++. .)

To: REALbasic Plugins <realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: OT: Framework vs. dylib (Was: Incorporating existing C/C++. .)
From: Michael Williams <lists at mgreg dot com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:20:16 -0400
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-plugins at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20070731154618 dot BF5A84E95E7 at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <30490C6F-2918-4A5D-AB75-599AF4353CC6 at desuetude dot com>
I'll check the book out.  As I said, despite repeated explanations,  
my confusion is still regarding the fact that there is a need to  
differentiate between debug and production builds.  Using a constant  
just makes sense, but the need for the value to be different  
depending on which it is seems a bit arbitrary.  I guess I'm curious  
as to why RB doesn't make it "intuitive"; a sort of "add-plugins-or- 
dylibs-here" type of reference if nothing else.

Anyway, I'll get to reading.  Thanks for the help thus far.

Regards,
Michael
On Jul 31, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Charles Yeomans wrote:

> Use a constant to refer to the library.  Set it for different values
> for debugBuild and not debugBuild.  I think this sort of thing is
> discussed in my online declares book.
>
> Charles Yeomans
>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>